Posted on Leave a comment

Is there going to be a cure for cancer or will it just take evolution for it to stop?

Can’t find a cancer cure? The fact of the matter is you‘ve been carrying it all around, all your life.

Understand that there’s no drug, nor a treatment protocol, in the world that can cure anything.

All drugs are either designed to kill, or attenuate, or neutralize, infections, but certainly they won’t do the curing by themselves. Same with any other protocols out there. They’re just creating the right environment for healing, at least that’s the claim. Or, they’ll just hide the symptoms of an underlying infection that will certainly develop into cancer if not mitigated in time.

It all boils down to finding the root cause of cancer and once you’ve gotten rid of it, the body’s own healing, or “curing,” mechanism will resume working, as it had been working the whole time since the day you were born, and until it was effectively defeated by the root cause of the ailment.

So, the question really is what the best protocol be, that should lead a cancer patient to the full elimination of the root cause of cancer?

Is it the toxic chemicals where the administering personnel need to wear a hazmat suit just to avoid chemical intoxication?

Is it the consumption of herbs, food supplements, in conjunction with mental relaxation, as most people in the non-technical sector suggest?

The key answer to the most fundamental question, what’s the best protocol that provides the best environment for healing, is to find the exact and most accurate root cause of cancer.

This has been a subject of countless heated debate from every corner of the medical profession. But it is worth knowing indeed, because once we have eliminated it, then that’s the time when the body can proceed to cure itself.

Here’s the medical definition of what a cancer is:

“In general, the cells of a multi-cellular organism are programmed for collaboration. Many diseases occur because the specialized cells fail to perform their assigned task. Cancer takes this malfunction one step further. Not only is there a failure of the cancer cell to maintain its specialized function, but it also strikes out on its own; the cancer cell competes to survive using natural mutability and natural selection to seek advantage over normal cells in a recapitulation of evolution.”

– Harrison’s Principles of Medicine

The 4000-page medical handbook has eloquently described the nature of what cancer is, yet it could not identify a single cure for cancer today. Why?

Aside from the fact that there’s no sustainable enterprise for a cure, the handbook just conveniently failed to identify the primary root cause of why the “specialized cells failed to perform their assigned task.”

In deep contrast, scientists and engineers have long discovered how to send manned space flight to the moon, and yet we could not ascertain the environment by which the “specialized cells failed to perform their assigned task?”

Is that really the case here?

In spite of the failure to identify the root cause of what makes the “specialized cells failed to perform their assigned task,” a slew of toxic chemical-based protocols were prescribed just the same.

75% Physicians Won’t Take Chemotherapy

The great lack of trust is evident even amongst doctors. Polls and questionnaires show that three doctors out of four (75 per cent) would refuse any chemotherapy because of its ineffectiveness against the disease and its devastating effects on the entire human organism. This is what many doctors and scientists have to say about chemotherapy:

“The majority of the cancer patients in this country die because of chemotherapy, which does not cure breast, colon or lung cancer. This has been documented for over a decade and nevertheless doctors still utilize chemotherapy to fight these tumors.”

(Allen Levin, MD, UCSF, “The Healing of Cancer”, Marcus Books, 1990).

“If I were to contract cancer, I would never turn to a certain standard for the therapy of this disease. Cancer patients who stay away from these centers have some chance to make it.”

(Prof. Gorge Mathe, “Scientific Medicine Stymied”, Medicines Nouvelles, Paris, 1989)

“Dr. Hardin Jones, lecturer at the University of California, after having analyzed for many decades statistics on cancer survival, has come to this conclusion: ‘… when not treated, the patients do not get worse or they even get better’. The unsettling conclusions of Dr. Jones have never been refuted”.

(Walter Last, “The Ecologist”, Vol. 28, no. 2, March-April 1998)

“Many oncologists recommend chemotherapy for almost any type of cancer, with a faith that is unshaken by the almost constant failures.”

(Albert Braverman, MD, “Medical Oncology in the 90s”, Lancet, 1991, Vol. 337, p. 901)

“Our most efficacious regimens are loaded with risks, side effects and practical problems; and after all the patients we have treated have paid the toll, only a miniscule percentage of them is paid off with an ephemeral period of tumoral regression and generally a partial one.”

(Edward G. Griffin “World Without Cancer”, American Media Publications, 1996)

“After all, and for the overwhelming majority of the cases, there is no proof whatsoever that chemotherapy prolongs survival expectations. And this is the great lie about this therapy, that there is a correlation between the reduction of cancer and the extension of the life of the patient.”

(Philip Day, “Cancer: Why we’re still dying to know the truth”, Credence Publications, 2000)

“Several full-time scientists at the McGill Cancer Center sent to 118 doctors, all experts on lung cancer, a questionnaire to determine the level of trust they had in the therapies they were applying; they were asked to imagine that they themselves had contracted the disease and which of the six current experimental therapies they would choose. 79 doctors answered, 64 of them said that they would not consent to undergo any treatment containing cis-platinum – one of the common chemotherapy drugs they used – while 58 out of 79 believed that all the experimental therapies above were not accepted because of the ineffectiveness and the elevated level of toxicity of chemotherapy.”

(Philip Day, “Cancer: Why we’re still dying to know the truth”, Credence Publications, 2000)

“Doctor Ulrich Able, a German epidemiologist of the Heidelberg Mannheim Tumor Clinic, has exhaustively analyzed and reviewed all the main studies and clinical experiments ever performed on chemotherapy …. Able discovered that the comprehensive world rate of positive outcomes because of chemotherapy was frightening, because, simply, nowhere was scientific evidence available demonstrating that chemotherapy is able to ‘prolong in any appreciable way the life of patients affected by the most common type of organ cancer.’ Able highlights that rarely can chemotherapy improve the quality of life, and he describes it as a scientific squalor while maintaining that at least 80 per cent of chemotherapy administered in the world is worthless. Even if there is no scientific proof whatsoever that chemotherapy works, neither doctors nor patients are prepared to give it up (Lancet, Aug. 10, 1991). None of the main media has ever mentioned this exhaustive study: it has been completely buried”

(Tim O’Shea, “Chemotherapy – An Unproven Procedure”)

“According to medical associations, the notorious and dangerous side effects of drugs have become the fourth main cause of death after infarction, cancer, and apoplexy”

(Journal of the American Medical Association, April 15, 1998)

The following quotes should help us weighing the pros and cons of using chemical-based protocols:

“Does it make sense if I told you, “You’re really sick. I’ve got an idea, let me poison you?”

Dr. Thomas Lodi realized that he “could no longer ethically practice conventional medicine.” He speaks about healing cancer naturally.

“I worked in an industry, the Pharmaceutical industry that do nothing but annihilate the population of this world.”

Dr. John Rengen Virapen, former Eli Lilly & Co executive who after 35 years of service decided to quit and speak out about Big Pharma’s method for profit and the benefit of symptomatic diseases that people live with for the duration of their lives.

Since we could not find any decisive protocol against cancer from the medical handbooks and in the field of medical practice, it is only fitting to consult those who were independently seeking the answer to our fundamental question.

What Really Causes Cancer?

“Deprive a cell 35% of its oxygen for 48 hours and it may become cancerous. Cancerous tissues are acidic, whereas healthy tissues are alkaline. Water splits into H+ and OH- ions, if there is an excess of H+, it is acidic; if there is an excess of OH- ions, then it is alkaline… the prime cause of cancer is oxygen deficiency (brought about by Toxemia.) “

Otto Warburg, Nobel laureate

“In reality, it is not the bacteria themselves that produce the disease, but the chemical constituents of these microorganisms enacting upon the unbalanced cell metabolism of the human body that produces the disease. If the metabolism of the human body is perfectly balanced, it is susceptible to NO disease.”

Dr. Royal Raymond Rife

Carcinogens were thought to be the cause of cancer. Actually, they drew the cancer to the organ. Nickel draws cancer to the prostate. Barium found in lipstick draws cancer to the breast. And so on.”

Dr. Hulda Clark

“Cancer is a fungal infestation. Fungal tumor can easily be eliminated by using a 5% solution of baking soda…”

Dr. Tullio Simoncini

We can easily verify if their claims are valid, or not.

Find yourself a fungal infestation around your house. Irrigate it with your homemade baking soda solution, and see if the fungi disappear in time. If successful, explore how much you can take in orally by knowing the normal pH of the blood or urine.

Normal arterial blood pH level is about 7.41 and venous blood is 7.37 pH. Below this mark, say 6.5 pH, can be disastrous.

There are pH strips being sold in pharmacies for this purpose. That’s how you check if you’ve gone overboard already.

You can increase your oxygen levels through regular workouts or daily exercise, and increased water intake. You can enhance the effects of these two routines by using an ozonizer to treat water prior to drinking.

Understand also that when sodium bicarbonate [baking soda] reacts with hydrochloric acid in your stomach, more oxygen atoms are released, thereby reinforcing the body’s need for oxygen to suffocate the parasites therein.

The above simple protocol is synergistic with what is already there:

Gastric acid, gastric juice or stomach acid, is a digestive fluid formed in the stomach and is composed of hydrochloric acid (HCl), potassium chloride (KCl) and sodium chloride (NaCl). … Other cells in the stomach produce bicarbonate, a base, to buffer the fluid, ensuring that it does not become too acidic. – Wikipedia

That’s just the start, and if you need to neutralize all types of parasites without using toxic drugs, try the non-invasive arterial blood electrification using a device like Virutron, and literally see your blood without viral or parasitic infections in 3 to 6 months!

That’s when you get your autoimmune system working back again and full remission should be its forgone conclusion.

Yes, there’s no rocket science required.

For the best option on how to protect the entire family from the adverse effects of vaccinations, eliminate the risks of hospitalization, and help your body decisively cure itself from cancer, or any other conditions caused by any known and unknown type of bioweapons, try the electronic Virutron® PRO Full Spectrum Antiviral + CES System and worry no more...

 
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *