With close to 400 peer reviewed articles on his belt, Dr. Peter Aaby concluded that many of the children in the Third World died of DTP vaccinations, and the World Health Organization is pretending that it knows nothing about what the data say, and what the vaccines are actually doing inside the children’s body.
That’s because nobody from the World Health Organization are willing to look and study the statistics from the data gathered post-immunization. But Dr. Aaby did exactly that for the last 40 years, or so, of his life.
Evidence of Increase in Mortality After the Introduction of Diphtheria–Tetanus–Pertussis Vaccine to Children Aged 6–35 Months in Guinea-Bissau: A Time for Reflection?
Peter Aaby, Søren Wengel Mogensen, Amabelia Rodrigues, and Christine S. Benn
Background
Whole-cell diphtheria–tetanus–pertussis (DTP) and oral polio vaccine (OPV) were introduced to children in Guinea-Bissau in 1981. We previously reported that DTP in the target age group from 3 to 5 months of age was associated with higher overall mortality. DTP and OPV were also given to older children and in this study we tested the effect on mortality in children aged 6–35 months.
Methods
In the 1980s, the suburb Bandim in the capital of Guinea-Bissau was followed with demographic surveillance and tri-monthly weighing sessions for children under 3 years of age. From June 1981, routine vaccinations were offered at the weighing sessions. We calculated mortality hazard ratio (HR) for DTP-vaccinated and DTP-unvaccinated children aged 6–35 months using Cox proportional hazard models. Including this study, the introduction of DTP vaccine and child mortality has been studied in three studies; we made a meta-estimate of these studies.
Results
At the first weighing session after the introduction of vaccines, 6–35-month-old children who received DTP vaccination had better weight-for-age z-scores (WAZ) than children who did not receive DTP; one unit increase in WAZ was associated with an odds ratio of 1.32 (95% CI = 1.13–1.55) for receiving DTP vaccination. Though lower mortality compared with not being DTP-vaccinated was, therefore, expected, DTP vaccination was associated with a non-significant trend in the opposite direction, the HR being 2.22 (0.82–6.04) adjusted for WAZ. In a sensitivity analysis, including all children weighed at least once before the vaccination program started, DTP (±OPV) as the most recent vaccination compared with live vaccines or no vaccine was associated with a HR of 1.89 (1.00–3.55). In the three studies of the introduction of DTP in rural and urban Guinea-Bissau, DTP-vaccinated children had an HR of 2.14 (1.42–3.23) compared to DTP-unvaccinated children; this effect was separately significant for girls [HR = 2.60 (1.57–4.32)], but not for boys [HR = 1.71 (0.99–2.93)] (test for interaction p = 0.27).
Conclusion
Although having better nutritional status and being protected against three infections, 6–35 months old DTP-vaccinated children tended to have higher mortality than DTP-unvaccinated children. All studies of the introduction of DTP have found increased overall mortality.
Keywords: bias in vaccine studies, diphtheria–tetanus–pertussis vaccine, heterologous effects, measles vaccine, non-specific effects of vaccines, oral polio vaccine
Key Observations
- DTP and oral polio vaccine (OPV) were first introduced to children aged 6–35 months in June 1981 in an urban area in Guinea-Bissau. Children who were DTP-vaccinated at the first weighing session after the introduction of DTP had significantly better weight-for-age z-scores than those not vaccinated.
- Although better survival was expected, the DTP-vaccinated children had twofold higher mortality than DTP-unvaccinated children.
- In a meta-analysis of the three studies of the introduction of DTP in urban and rural Guinea-Bissau, DTP-vaccinated children had twofold higher mortality than DTP-unvaccinated children.
Continue reading: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5868131/
So, when they say that there’s not enough data to be skeptical about vaccinations, they’re just trying to tell us that they’ll never stop killing our children even if the facts point in that direction.
https://youtu.be/Jifp1BdmKsw
That’s even assuming, of course, that there was no deliberate manipulation in the reporting of actual adverse reactions and deaths post-vaccination. But as you can see from the video, there’s such a thing as “survival bias”, wherein those who survived from the mass vaccination were counted as “vaccinated”, and those that died from the same vaccination were reported as “unvaccinated.” WHO personnel on the ground were doing that as per Dr. Aaby’s reference data can attest.
They love to talk about percentages when they justify the mathematics of vaccine survivality, but who in the world would want to play Russian roulette with their children?
“All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis.”—Dr Peter Aaby et al., of the Statens Serum Institute, Denmark.
While Dr. Aaby condemns the DTP related deaths, and at the same time praising the positive outcome of measles vaccination, another study has come out with a conclusion that measles vaccination is the root cause of the spread of the measles itself.
What is also conveniently ignored in all these studies, however, is the long-term side-effects of vaccinations in general, which can only be determined by looking at the steady increase of cancer incidence since vaccinations begun.
Nevertheless, his work is proving once again that we cannot trust the system, and the Middlemen that profit from it.
We’re on the right track for the last 10 years, i.e. vaccination destroys the autoimmune system, while the use of electrical pulses to neutralize all types of viruses on demand, only strengthens it because the procedure doesn’t leave behind any toxicity and actual live viruses whatsoever.
