German scientists have found out that administration of the AstraZeneca vaccine could potentially produce antibodies that would in turn stimulate formation of blood clots in “rare” cases as the WHO sees no such “causal” link.
A research team from Germany’s Greifswald University Hospital have discovered a mechanism that could lead to the development of sinus or cerebral vein thrombosis in patients who received the AstraZeneca jab.
The team received six blood samples of people who suffered from thrombosis after taking the jab. The samples were provided by the Paul Ehrlich Institute – the body responsible for approval and monitoring of all vaccines in Germany.
Following the analysis, the Greifswald researchers found out that an immune response to the vaccine could involve formation of antibodies that are normally formed only when an organism needs to heal a wound through blood coagulation, the German broadcaster NDR reported.
These antibodies then “activate” the platelets and could stimulate the formation of blood clots, particularly in the brain’s venous sinuses.
The team’s conclusions, which are yet to be published in any scientific journal, were then shared by the German Research Association for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (GTH), which issued a new guideline for patients receiving the vaccine.
The association’s statement said that the Greifswald team found an “important pathomechanism” but still noted that such complication is “specific and very rare.” It also said that the discovery does not rule out a situation in which thrombosis in patients who took the AstraZeneca jab was triggered by “other causes.”
The GTH also said that it recorded at least 13 cases of a sinus or cerebral vein thrombosis in those vaccinated with the AstraZeneca jab in Germany, including 12 women and one man aged between 20 and 63. All patients had similar symptoms that were likely caused by an “immunological event,” it added.
The Greifswald team, meanwhile, also suggested a targeted treatment for people suffering from thrombosis after the vaccination. Still, it can only be applied after the blood clots appear and cannot be used as prevention.
In light of the latest developments, the GTH issued a new recommendation encouraging all those suffering from continuous headache, dizziness or impaired vision more than three days after the vaccination to undergo a special screening to alleviate the risk of developing thrombosis and get timely medical assistance.
The news came as the World Health Organization (WHO) issued its own statement on the safety of the AstraZeneca vaccine, saying that the jab still has “a positive benefit-risk profile.” The UN health watchdog’s Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety reviewed data from Europe, the UK and India as well as its own global database and said it did not find “any overall increase in clotting conditions” linked to the vaccine.
The WHO also said that it is not “certain” that “very rare and unique thromboembolic events” like cerebral venous sinus thrombosis “have been caused by vaccination.”
“A causal relationship between these rare events has not been established at this time,” it said.
German scientists are not the first to point to a link between the AstraZeneca vaccine and thrombosis. Earlier, similar conclusions were presented by Norwegian specialists. Still, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) once again deemed the jab safe and effective this Thursday, following a week-long review.
The decision prompted some European nations that earlier halted the vaccine’s use over concerns about its health risks to resume its administration. German Chancellor Angela Merkel also said in Friday she would “definitely” be vaccinated with the AstraZeneca jab.
The chancellor spoke out in favor of using Russia’s Sputnik V vaccine in case of its approval by the EU. If Brussels does not place any orders for the Russian jab after its approval, Berlin could very well do that on its own, she added. – RTNews
“Correlation does not imply causation” is a phrase that is constantly used by the defenders of mass vaccinations. For them, mass vaccinations must continue until a definitive and conclusive evidence is presented to support the claim of vaccine induced injuries and deaths.
What happens to the principle of First, Do no harm? Or, the commonsensical Safety First?
How the misuse of PCT tests as a “reliable” way of testing for COVID19 infections? Is PCR test a definitive way to diagnose for viral infections?
Not so, according to its own inventor Dr. Kary B. Mullis.
What is PCR?
“In the early 1990’s, PCR, came into popular use, and Kary Mullis was awarded the Nobel Prize for it in 1993. PCR, simply put, is a thermal cycling method used to make up to billions of copies of a specific DNA sample, making it large enough to study. PCR is an indispensable technique with a broad variety of applications including biomedical research and criminal forensics.”
According to Mullis himself, PCR cannot be totally and should never be used as a tool in “the diagnosis of infectious diseases.” This is the main reason why Mullis disagreed with the scientists who are behind the HIV-AIDS hypothesis. He defied the mainstream notion that “the disease-causing mechanisms of HIV are simply too “mysterious” to comprehend. According to him, “The mystery of that damn virus has been generated by the $2 billion a year they spend on it.
You take any other virus, and you spend $2 billion, and you can make up some great mysteries about it too.” He also added that, “Human beings are full of retrovirus. We don’t know if it is hundreds or thousands or hundreds of thousands. We’ve only recently started to look for them. But they’ve never killed anybody before. People have always survived retroviruses.”
With regards to the current coronavirus crisis, which some believed to be deceptively manufactured and engineered, this situation of the HIV-AIDS phenomena that Kary Mullis decries about is not far or different. However, the reaction of the authorities today globally is more severe while also tragically preposterous as they put up policies and protocols that are obviously violating the citizen’s constitutional rights while also destroying the economy, making life miserable and harder for ordinary people that even several police officers across the US, for example, reacted and complained.
To learn more about why this crisis is ridiculously based on faulty “science”, let’s hear what other experts say about the coronavirus testing.
According to Jason Hommel, a prolific writer and researcher and also the author of the very important article regarding coronavirus testing entitled “Scientists Say the COVID19 Test Kits Do Not Work, Are Worthless, and Give Impossible Results”:
“PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome. The problem is the test is known not to work. It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analysed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery. Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.”
Kary B. Mullis was an American biochemist recognized for his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, which he shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Michael Smith and was awarded the Japan Prize in the same year.
Dr. Mullis died in August 7, 2019, exactly 2 months and 11 days prior to Bill Gates sponsored EVENT 201 – “a 3.5-hour pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of dramatic, scenario-based facilitated discussions, confronting difficult, true-to-life dilemmas associated with response to a hypothetical, but scientifically plausible, pandemic.”
Right on cue,
The first human cases of COVID-19 were identified in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. At this stage it is not possible to determine precisely how humans in China were initially infected with SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, some developments may become known or fully understood only in retrospect. The World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on 30 January 2020, and a pandemic on 11 March 2020.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic
PCR test results became the anchor on which COVID19 lockdowns were justified worldwide.
While there’s a strict requirements to prove ‘causality” for vaccine injuries, there was no strict requirement for COVID19 infection confirmation, i.e. asymptomatic individuals were labeled COVID infected solely by the virtue of having positive PCR test results where the WHO recommended 45 cycles of amplification was used.
Recall that Dr. Mullis only allowed up to 27 cycles maximum for testing the presence of viral fragments in vaccines during their production, and warned it not to be used for diagnostic purposes.
Modern Medicine Operates Under An Exceptional Set of Standards
There seems to be a separate standard being followed in the medical sickness industry, as opposed to engineering.
A glaring disparity is when Modern Medicine is compared to electrical, civil engineering, and architecture, where these fields are required to follow a set of well established protocols guaranteeing that a structure will not fail at certain thresholds.
There’s no debate for every new construction project anymore as to what these thresholds should be in the present. The Building and Electrical Codes are there for local government engineers to refer to for enforcements, as to the type and strength of materials to be used and overall design of the structure.
In electronics and mechanical product design, the manufacturers are required to ensure the safety of their use. For any defects in workmanship, a full moneyback guarantee is offered. There’s no analogue like this in medical practice.
There’s no section in their vaccine insert that says ‘full refund when no autoimmunity is achieved.” What they have is a list of Possible Side-effects and Contraindications in fine print, and that’s enough for them to be absolved of any culpability.
In fact in Modern Medicine, the rules are constantly changing to accommodate and massage medical failures in real time. What they have as reference is Medical Code and Billing.
More conveniently, drug manufacturers and medical practitioners are not required of a guarantee against product and service failures, as their engineering counterparts are. They are not required to cure a sick patient for good with their encapsulated solutions.
The recurrence of cancer is labeled an “Act of God” and that there’s nothing they could do about it. But just the same, you are enticed to do the chemo one more time.
When somebody dies right after vaccination, they simply chorus “Correlation does not imply causation!” So short and easy to memorize. Shuts down all criticism, but the pain and suffering lingers on.
But isn’t it that whatever is put inside the human body is far more critical in its operation than a concrete structure outside of it, and therefore, should have much stricter rules than the latter?